{"id":515,"date":"2005-10-15T17:41:00","date_gmt":"2005-10-15T17:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/?p=515"},"modified":"2005-10-15T17:41:00","modified_gmt":"2005-10-15T17:41:00","slug":"where-do-posts-go-when-the-computer-eats-them","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/uncategorized\/where-do-posts-go-when-the-computer-eats-them\/","title":{"rendered":"Where do posts go when the computer eats them?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I was thinking the other day about how interesting (and weird and scary and sad) it is that some of the most important things I own exist only in pixels. <\/p>\n<p>And I guess this is really the way of the future, and it doesn&#8217;t bother me all that much because I have access to the technology that makes it possible. Sometimes I miss having printed photos to hold (all of mine now sit quietly in my hard drive), but I know that I could make printed photos from a disc or a flashcard all the livelong day if I wanted to at to my local Walgreens\/Target\/Wal-Mart. And having MP3s instead of CDs, well, I&#8217;m not quite there yet, but someday I probably will be. And I&#8217;ll miss having the printed liner notes, but I don&#8217;t ever really look at those anyway, and you can download them from iTunes if you buy a whole album. <\/p>\n<p>Lately, my technothinking has been inspired in part by something Nick and I drunkenly talked about at Cox&#8217;s and in a subsequent sober e-mail conversation: Seriously, what is the future of newspapers? He said his boss at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stategazette.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">The State Gazette<\/a> isn&#8217;t worried, especially about the fate of small local papers. I can see where he&#8217;s coming from, especially concerning small, family-owned papers, but for the bigger papers? When shareholders are involved, it gets a lot more squicky (that&#8217;s the technical term).<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s something I&#8217;m cautiously not-so-optimistic about, since they&#8217;re ringing the alarm bells &#8212; albeit quietly &#8212; where I work. And everywhere else. Circulation is shrinking, layoffs are rampant, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2128109\/?nav=fix\" target=\"_blank\">publishers are erroneously whining about the rising cost of newsprint<\/a>. The whole industry knows that we are on the lip of a major paradigm shift, and no one is willing to come out and say what I think the youngest of us already know: Get it all online or die. <\/p>\n<p>The 24-hour news cycle has been the gold standard for years now; newspapers have stubbornly insisted that they can continue to make their readers wait until 5 a.m. every morning to learn the day&#8217;s news, but we&#8217;re seeing that readers are spurning the traditional we-tell-you-what&#8217;s-best-and-when attitude the big omnipresent papers have traditionally fostered. And this pains me, because I&#8217;m one of those assholes who <i>does<\/i> think the print media knows what&#8217;s best for the people. But I also know that that makes me and everyone else who thinks that an asshole, and that it&#8217;s losing us our readership and trust and credibility in the community. That attitude just won&#8217;t fly anymore. And, ultimately, in the words of David Bishop, if you don&#8217;t have credibility, you don&#8217;t have anything. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s clear, I think, that modern news consumers are beginning to expect news in real-time: constantly updated, dynamic, in-depth stories that are available as soon as they come into existence. People don&#8217;t <i>have<\/i> to wait until the paperboy hurls their paper into the shrubbery at dawn to learn what&#8217;s happening in the world, so they won&#8217;t and they don&#8217;t. They can do it instantly at any minute of the day over the web. And we all know how our society feels about instant gratification. <\/p>\n<p>So newspapers need to swallow their pride and start shaking up their very foundations and structures. No more should there be holding a story in the can until there is space or time to run it. No more of the &#8220;it&#8217;s news until we print it&#8221; attitude that means even day-old stuff gets treated as new news if it didn&#8217;t get in the day before. No more of the slapping the printed product on the web and wondering why more people aren&#8217;t clogging the hit counter. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s going to mean reporters and editors constantly filing updates on the online versions of the stories. It&#8217;s going to mean aggressive, thoughtful linking within stories. It&#8217;s going to mean the printed product will serve as a daily digest of news with the latest updates &#8212; like always &#8212; but the online sphere is where the news will need to flourish and grow. This creates a tremendous 24-hour workload that might not be cost-effective when you take into consideration how cheap (and, as of now, underutilized) online advertising is. Can papers continue to offer their web sites for free? I hate to be prompted to enter my zip code when I view a web site, much less be asked to pay to see the news. <\/p>\n<p>So how will the future newspaper, if its meat is online, make money to fuel the staff it will take to create a 24-hour print news cycle? That&#8217;s the crux of the issue, I think. That&#8217;s why more papers haven&#8217;t taken that plunge yet. That, and they just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth the risk to try and apply that 24-hour cycle to their mostly local news, which doesn&#8217;t operate on the kind of constant cycle world and even national news does. So mid-sized papers like the CA are sort of caught in the middle, and I think it shows in our ambivalence about what the next step is. <\/p>\n<p>Too scary? OK, go read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2128041\/?nav=tap3\" target=\"_blank\">this funny story<\/a> about Tom &#8220;Crazyteeth&#8221; Cruise and Katie &#8220;Slackeyed&#8221; Holmes. It&#8217;s a hoot and three-quarters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was thinking the other day about how interesting (and weird and scary and sad) it is that some of the most important things I own exist only in pixels. And I guess this is really the way of the future, and it doesn&#8217;t bother me all that much because I have access to the technology that makes it possible. Sometimes I miss having printed photos to hold (all of mine now sit quietly in&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-515","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1jWWl-8j","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/515","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=515"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/515\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=515"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=515"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theogeo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=515"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}